The "official" blog of Mr_Theory!
---
Now primarily dealing with chess where ever I happen to be located at the time of writing but also some coverage of state, national and world chess news. All from my point of view - but of course!
---
You want to play chess and need to find a club or chess tournament in Central Oregon? Please visit Paul Motta's excellent website: http://www.bendchess.com/
You want to find a club in Phoenix Arizona or Portland? Send me an email! : P
---
I enjoy hiking, running, jogging, biking, snowshoeing, quail watching, hanging out in used book stores, and of course the playing, teaching or learning about the royal game of chess.
Although, you Got the #Checkmate and won the game, probably in the Least Number of Moves... Could you have Proceeded Better (Playing against the Board and NOT the Opponent)? Usually, in quick Games, a Severe Vulnerability is made, which is only Justified if the Opponent made an Even Bigger Weakness... GG, though.
Here are my Thoughts: Move #3 - Bc4, left the g2 sqaure vulnerable, Prematurely, it's a Weakness, and although it is defended by a "Developing Move" ,namely 0-0, the Problem later lies with the Fork and attack to your King... (you were Overly excited by His weakening Queen Move) I would think Nc3 is a Better "PLAN" Because it THREATENS to Tempo the Queen on d5, with the Most Natural Developing Move Directed at the Center, and also Attack with the FORK on c7! However, before that move is considered to be Played - d4 should be achieved! Why? 2 attackers on d4 (pawn & Queen) vs. 2 defenders (Knight & Queen), it's Too easy for Black to Get "1 UP" on the d4 Square... Also, if exd4, after Nxd4, then that Knight would have the Potiental to Later goto b5 and Join-in on the Fork Threat on c7... Also, with Nf6 Not able to be Played, d4 is a "Safe" Move, at this time!
1 Comments:
Although, you Got the #Checkmate and won the game, probably in the Least Number of Moves... Could you have Proceeded Better (Playing against the Board and NOT the Opponent)? Usually, in quick Games, a Severe Vulnerability is made, which is only Justified if the Opponent made an Even Bigger Weakness... GG, though.
Here are my Thoughts:
Move #3 - Bc4, left the g2 sqaure vulnerable, Prematurely, it's a Weakness, and although it is defended by a "Developing Move" ,namely 0-0, the Problem later lies with the Fork and attack to your King... (you were Overly excited by His weakening Queen Move) I would think Nc3 is a Better "PLAN" Because it THREATENS to Tempo the Queen on d5, with the Most Natural Developing Move Directed at the Center, and also Attack with the FORK on c7! However, before that move is considered to be Played - d4 should be achieved! Why? 2 attackers on d4 (pawn & Queen) vs. 2 defenders (Knight & Queen), it's Too easy for Black to Get "1 UP" on the d4 Square... Also, if exd4, after Nxd4, then that Knight would have the Potiental to Later goto b5 and Join-in on the Fork Threat on c7... Also, with Nf6 Not able to be Played, d4 is a "Safe" Move, at this time!
What do you think?
Post a Comment
<< Home